Acuna Carmona v. Warden, FCI Sandstone
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Felix Alberto Acuna Carmona, Case No. 25-CV-0581 (KMM/DLM) Petitioner, v. ORDER Warden, FCI Sandstone, Respondent.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko dated March 14, 2025. R&R, Dkt. 8.
Judge Micko recommends that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by petitioner Felix Alberto Acuna Carmona be denied and this action be dismissed. The deadline for objections to the R&R to be filed was March 28, 2025. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b)(1). Mr. Carmona did not file any objections by that deadline, and he has not filed anything since Judge Micko issued the R&R. When no objections are filed, the Court reviews an R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F. Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Having reviewed the R&R and the record in this case, the Court finds no error in the R&R. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDER THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation dated March 14, 2025 [Dkt. 8] is ACCEPTED.
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus of petitioner Felix Alberto Acuna Carmona [Dkt. 1] is DENIED.
3. This matter is DISMISSED.
Let Judgment be entered accordingly.
Date: April 8, 2025 s/Katherine Menendez Katherine Menendez United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Felix Alberto Acuna Carmona, Case No. 25-CV-0581 (KMM/DLM) Petitioner, v. ORDER Warden, FCI Sandstone, Respondent.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko dated March 14, 2025. R&R, Dkt. 8.
Judge Micko recommends that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by petitioner Felix Alberto Acuna Carmona be denied and this action be dismissed. The deadline for objections to the R&R to be filed was March 28, 2025. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b)(1). Mr. Carmona did not file any objections by that deadline, and he has not filed anything since Judge Micko issued the R&R. When no objections are filed, the Court reviews an R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F. Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Having reviewed the R&R and the record in this case, the Court finds no error in the R&R. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDER THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation dated March 14, 2025 [Dkt. 8] is ACCEPTED.
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus of petitioner Felix Alberto Acuna Carmona [Dkt. 1] is DENIED.
3. This matter is DISMISSED.
Let Judgment be entered accordingly.
Date: April 8, 2025 s/Katherine Menendez Katherine Menendez United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.