U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2025

Reynolds v. Eischen

Reynolds v. Eischen
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided April 11, 2025

Reynolds v. Eischen

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

TERRELL REYNOLDS, Case No. 24-cv-2956 (LMP/DJF) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION B. EISCHEN, FPC Duluth, Respondent.

This matter is before the Court on the March 11, 2025 Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster, which recommends dismissing Petitioner Terrell Reynolds’s habeas petition. See ECF No. 16. No party objected to the R&R, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2), so the Court reviews the R&R for clear error, Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Discerning no clear error, the Court adopts the R&R in full.

ORDER Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in this matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 16) is ADOPTED IN FULL.

2. The Amended Petition (ECF No. 10) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: April 11, 2025 s/Laura M. Provinzino Laura M. Provinzino United States District Judge

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

TERRELL REYNOLDS, Case No. 24-cv-2956 (LMP/DJF) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION B. EISCHEN, FPC Duluth, Respondent.

This matter is before the Court on the March 11, 2025 Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster, which recommends dismissing Petitioner Terrell Reynolds’s habeas petition. See ECF No. 16. No party objected to the R&R, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2), so the Court reviews the R&R for clear error, Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Discerning no clear error, the Court adopts the R&R in full.

ORDER Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in this matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 16) is ADOPTED IN FULL.

2. The Amended Petition (ECF No. 10) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: April 11, 2025 s/Laura M. Provinzino Laura M. Provinzino United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.