U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2025

Day v. Deanae

Day v. Deanae
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided April 15, 2025

Day v. Deanae

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Keleta R. Day and Travis Robinson, File No. 25-cv-759 (ECT/JFD) Plaintiffs, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Deanae, Dundae W. (Dunnve), and Deadae, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty issued a Report and Recommendation1 on March 31, 2025. ECF No. 4. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based on all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 4] is ACCEPTED; and 2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: April 15, 2025 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court Though titled “Order,” Judge Docherty clearly intended the document to be a Report and Recommendation. See ECF No. 4.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Keleta R. Day and Travis Robinson, File No. 25-cv-759 (ECT/JFD) Plaintiffs, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Deanae, Dundae W. (Dunnve), and Deadae, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty issued a Report and Recommendation1 on March 31, 2025. ECF No. 4. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based on all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 4] is ACCEPTED; and 2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: April 15, 2025 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court Though titled “Order,” Judge Docherty clearly intended the document to be a Report and Recommendation. See ECF No. 4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.