Bell v. Duluth Prison Camp
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Michael Bell, Case No. 25-CV-00909 (JMB/DTS) Petitioner,
ORDER v. Duluth Prison Camp, Respondent.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate David T. Schultz dated April 17, 2025. (Doc. No. 4.) The R&R recommends that the Court dismiss this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. (See id.) Bell has not objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. No. 4) is ADOPTED.
2. The Court DISMISSES this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: May 13, 2025 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Michael Bell, Case No. 25-CV-00909 (JMB/DTS) Petitioner,
ORDER v. Duluth Prison Camp, Respondent.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate David T. Schultz dated April 17, 2025. (Doc. No. 4.) The R&R recommends that the Court dismiss this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. (See id.) Bell has not objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. No. 4) is ADOPTED.
2. The Court DISMISSES this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: May 13, 2025 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.