U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2025

Lahmann v. Barclays Bank Delaware

Lahmann v. Barclays Bank Delaware
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided May 30, 2025
Lahmann v. Barclays Bank Delaware

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

AARON LAHMANN, Case No. 24-cv-4289 (LMP/LIB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendants.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, which recommends dismissing Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. because Plaintiff Aaron Lahmann has not provided proof that he served that company with a summons or complaint or otherwise complied with the Court’s March 12, 2025 Order. ECF No. 10. No objections have been filed to the R&R in the time period permitted, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).

Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (ECF No. 10) is ADOPTED; 2. Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. is DISMISSED without prejudice.

Dated: May 30, 2025 s/Laura M. Provinzino Laura M. Provinzino United States District Judge

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

AARON LAHMANN, Case No. 24-cv-4289 (LMP/LIB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendants.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, which recommends dismissing Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. because Plaintiff Aaron Lahmann has not provided proof that he served that company with a summons or complaint or otherwise complied with the Court’s March 12, 2025 Order. ECF No. 10. No objections have been filed to the R&R in the time period permitted, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).

Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (ECF No. 10) is ADOPTED; 2. Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. is DISMISSED without prejudice.

Dated: May 30, 2025 s/Laura M. Provinzino Laura M. Provinzino United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.