De Los Santos-Hernandez v. Rardin
De Los Santos-Hernandez v. Rardin
Trial Court Opinion
UNITDEISDT SRTIACTT EOSF D MISINTRNIECSTO CTOAU RT
Felix De Los Santos-Hernandez, File No. 24-cv-3861 (ECT/ECW) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Jared Rardin, Defendant.
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wr ight iss ued a Report and Recommendation on April 30, 2025. ECF No. 16. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 16] is ACCEPTED.
2. Petitioner Felix De Los Santos-Hernandez’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [ECF No. 1] is DENIED.
3. Petitioner Felix De Los Santos-Hernandez’s request for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED.
4. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: June 2, 2025 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Trial Court Opinion
UNITDEISDT SRTIACTT EOSF D MISINTRNIECSTO CTOAU RT
Felix De Los Santos-Hernandez, File No. 24-cv-3861 (ECT/ECW) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Jared Rardin, Defendant.
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wr ight iss ued a Report and Recommendation on April 30, 2025. ECF No. 16. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 16] is ACCEPTED.
2. Petitioner Felix De Los Santos-Hernandez’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [ECF No. 1] is DENIED.
3. Petitioner Felix De Los Santos-Hernandez’s request for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED.
4. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: June 2, 2025 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.