Hamilton v. Eischen
Hamilton v. Eischen
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jesse Ray Hamilton, Case No. 25-CV-1293 (PJS/JFD) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND B. Eischen and FPC Duluth, RECOMMENDATION Respondents,
The Court has received the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. (Dkt. No. 5). No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 5) is ADOPTED; and 2. The Petition (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Date: June 11, 2025 /s/ Patrick J. Schiltz Patrick J. Schiltz Chief Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jesse Ray Hamilton, Case No. 25-CV-1293 (PJS/JFD) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND B. Eischen and FPC Duluth, RECOMMENDATION Respondents,
The Court has received the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. (Dkt. No. 5). No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 5) is ADOPTED; and 2. The Petition (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Date: June 11, 2025 /s/ Patrick J. Schiltz Patrick J. Schiltz Chief Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.