Haddeland v. State of Minnesota
Haddeland v. State of Minnesota
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Patrick Alan Haddeland, File No. 25-cv-1246 (ECT/ECW) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION State of Minnesota, Respondent.
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright issued a Report and Recommendation on May 19, 2025. ECF No. 4. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based on all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 4] is ACCEPTED; 2. The action is DISMISSED under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute; Petitioner Patrick Alan Haddeland’s filing titled “Writ of Habeas Corpus” [ECF No. 1], treated as a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, is DENIED; 4. Haddeland’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs [ECF No. 2] is DENIED as moot; and 5. No certificate of appealability shall issue.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: June 20, 2025 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Patrick Alan Haddeland, File No. 25-cv-1246 (ECT/ECW) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION State of Minnesota, Respondent.
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright issued a Report and Recommendation on May 19, 2025. ECF No. 4. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based on all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 4] is ACCEPTED; 2. The action is DISMISSED under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute; Petitioner Patrick Alan Haddeland’s filing titled “Writ of Habeas Corpus” [ECF No. 1], treated as a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, is DENIED; 4. Haddeland’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs [ECF No. 2] is DENIED as moot; and 5. No certificate of appealability shall issue.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: June 20, 2025 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.