Nelson v. Isanti County
Nelson v. Isanti County
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
STEVEN DOUGLAS NELSON, Case No. 25-cv-1354 (LMP/JFD) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING ISANTI COUNTY and ISANTI REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION COUNTY SHERIFF, Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the May 14, 2025 Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty, which recommends dismissing this action for failure to prosecute. See ECF No. 5. No party objected to the R&R, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2), so the Court reviews the R&R for clear error, Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Discerning no clear error, the Court adopts the R&R in full.
ORDER Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in this matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 5) is ADOPTED IN FULL; 2. The Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 3. The Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (ECF No. 2) is DENIED as moot.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: June 30, 2025 s/Laura M. Provinzino Laura M. Provinzino United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
STEVEN DOUGLAS NELSON, Case No. 25-cv-1354 (LMP/JFD) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING ISANTI COUNTY and ISANTI REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION COUNTY SHERIFF, Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the May 14, 2025 Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty, which recommends dismissing this action for failure to prosecute. See ECF No. 5. No party objected to the R&R, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2), so the Court reviews the R&R for clear error, Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Discerning no clear error, the Court adopts the R&R in full.
ORDER Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in this matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 5) is ADOPTED IN FULL; 2. The Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 3. The Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (ECF No. 2) is DENIED as moot.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: June 30, 2025 s/Laura M. Provinzino Laura M. Provinzino United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.