U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2025

Calles Corrales v. Eischen

Calles Corrales v. Eischen
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided June 30, 2025

Calles Corrales v. Eischen

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

ESVIN IVAN CALLES CORRALES, Case No. 25-cv-1987 (LMP/ECW) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION B. EISCHEN; FPC DULUTH; and FBOP, Respondents.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), ECF No. 4, of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright, which recommends denying Petitioner Esvin Ivan Calles Corrales’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, ECF No. 1.

No objections have been filed to the R&R in the time period permitted, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).

Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (ECF No. 4) is ADOPTED; 2. Calles Corrales’s Petition (ECF No. 1) is DENIED.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: June 30, 2025 s/Laura M. Provinzino Laura M. Provinzino United States District Judge

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

ESVIN IVAN CALLES CORRALES, Case No. 25-cv-1987 (LMP/ECW) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION B. EISCHEN; FPC DULUTH; and FBOP, Respondents.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), ECF No. 4, of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright, which recommends denying Petitioner Esvin Ivan Calles Corrales’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, ECF No. 1.

No objections have been filed to the R&R in the time period permitted, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).

Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (ECF No. 4) is ADOPTED; 2. Calles Corrales’s Petition (ECF No. 1) is DENIED.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: June 30, 2025 s/Laura M. Provinzino Laura M. Provinzino United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.