U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2025

Martinez v. Tuhy

Martinez v. Tuhy
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided July 1, 2025
Martinez v. Tuhy

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

QUINTANA JOE MARTINEZ, Case No. 25-cv-1958 (LMP/LIB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STEVEN TUHY, Defendant.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), ECF No. 3, of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, which recommends dismissing Plaintiff Quintana Joe Martinez’s Complaint, ECF No. 1, without prejudice for lack of subject- matter jurisdiction. No objections have been filed to the R&R in the time period permitted, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).

Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (ECF No. 3) is ADOPTED; 2. Martinez’s complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: July 1, 2025 s/Laura M. Provinzino Laura M. Provinzino United States District Judge

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

QUINTANA JOE MARTINEZ, Case No. 25-cv-1958 (LMP/LIB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STEVEN TUHY, Defendant.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), ECF No. 3, of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, which recommends dismissing Plaintiff Quintana Joe Martinez’s Complaint, ECF No. 1, without prejudice for lack of subject- matter jurisdiction. No objections have been filed to the R&R in the time period permitted, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).

Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (ECF No. 3) is ADOPTED; 2. Martinez’s complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: July 1, 2025 s/Laura M. Provinzino Laura M. Provinzino United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.