Rosales v. Segal
Rosales v. Segal
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Teri Lynn Rosales, Case No. 24-CV-3138 (KMM/JFD) Petitioner, v. ORDER Michael Segal, Warden, Respondent.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty, dated June 5, 2025. ECF 14.
The R&R finds that the Respondent has correctly calculated Petitioner’s sentence and recommends that her habeas petition be dismissed. Id. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time permitted.
The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F. Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Having carefully reviewed the R&R and the record, the Court finds no error in the R&R’s conclusions and agrees with its recommendation.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 1. The R&R (ECF 14) is ACCEPTED; 2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus of Petitioner Teri Lynn Rosales (ECF 1) is DENIED; and 3. This matter is DISMISSED.
Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.
Date: July 28, 2025 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Teri Lynn Rosales, Case No. 24-CV-3138 (KMM/JFD) Petitioner, v. ORDER Michael Segal, Warden, Respondent.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty, dated June 5, 2025. ECF 14.
The R&R finds that the Respondent has correctly calculated Petitioner’s sentence and recommends that her habeas petition be dismissed. Id. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time permitted.
The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F. Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Having carefully reviewed the R&R and the record, the Court finds no error in the R&R’s conclusions and agrees with its recommendation.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 1. The R&R (ECF 14) is ACCEPTED; 2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus of Petitioner Teri Lynn Rosales (ECF 1) is DENIED; and 3. This matter is DISMISSED.
Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.
Date: July 28, 2025 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.