U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2025

Katz v. Bureau of Prisons

Katz v. Bureau of Prisons
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided August 11, 2025
Katz v. Bureau of Prisons

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

DAVID EFREM KATZ, Case No. 24-cv-4245 (LMP/ECW) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION BUREAU OF PRISONS, Respondent.

This matter is before the Court on the July 24, 2025 Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright, which recommends denying Petitioner David Efrem Katz’s habeas petition as moot. See ECF No. 25. No party objected to the R&R, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2), so the Court reviews the R&R for clear error, Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Discerning no clear error, the Court adopts the R&R in full.

ORDER Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in this matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 25) is ADOPTED IN FULL.

2. The Amended Petition (ECF No. 13) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: August 11, 2025 s/Laura M. Provinzino Laura M. Provinzino United States District Judge

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

DAVID EFREM KATZ, Case No. 24-cv-4245 (LMP/ECW) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION BUREAU OF PRISONS, Respondent.

This matter is before the Court on the July 24, 2025 Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright, which recommends denying Petitioner David Efrem Katz’s habeas petition as moot. See ECF No. 25. No party objected to the R&R, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2), so the Court reviews the R&R for clear error, Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Discerning no clear error, the Court adopts the R&R in full.

ORDER Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in this matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 25) is ADOPTED IN FULL.

2. The Amended Petition (ECF No. 13) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: August 11, 2025 s/Laura M. Provinzino Laura M. Provinzino United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.