Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2025

Zazueta v. Eischen

Zazueta v. Eischen
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided August 13, 2025

Zazueta v. Eischen

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Pablo Zazueta, Case No. 25-CV-1664 (KMM/SGE) Petitioner, v. ORDER B. Eischen; FPC Duluth; and FBOP, Respondents.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Shannon G. Elkins, dated May 20, 2025. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise, and the R&R is accepted in full.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF 1) is DENIED.

2. This matter is DISMISSED without prejudice.

Let judgment be entered accordingly.

Date: August 13, 2025 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Pablo Zazueta, Case No. 25-CV-1664 (KMM/SGE) Petitioner, v. ORDER B. Eischen; FPC Duluth; and FBOP, Respondents.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Shannon G. Elkins, dated May 20, 2025. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise, and the R&R is accepted in full.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF 1) is DENIED.

2. This matter is DISMISSED without prejudice.

Let judgment be entered accordingly.

Date: August 13, 2025 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑