U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2025

Salgat v. Otter Tail County District Court

Salgat v. Otter Tail County District Court
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided September 29, 2025

Salgat v. Otter Tail County District Court

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

William Earl Salgat, File No. 25-cv-3354 (ECT/DLM) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Otter Tail County District Court, Respondent.

Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko issued a Report and Recommendation on August 29, 2025. ECF No. 4. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based on all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 4] is ACCEPTED.

2. Petitioner William Earl Salgat’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF No. 1] is DENIED.

3. This action is DISMISSED.

4. No certificate of appealability shall issue.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: September 29, 2025 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

William Earl Salgat, File No. 25-cv-3354 (ECT/DLM) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Otter Tail County District Court, Respondent.

Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko issued a Report and Recommendation on August 29, 2025. ECF No. 4. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based on all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 4] is ACCEPTED.

2. Petitioner William Earl Salgat’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF No. 1] is DENIED.

3. This action is DISMISSED.

4. No certificate of appealability shall issue.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: September 29, 2025 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.