Salgat v. A-Affordable Bail Bonds, Inc.
Salgat v. A-Affordable Bail Bonds, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
WILLIAM EARL SALGAT, Case No. 25-cv-3353 (LMP/SGE) Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION A-AFFORDABLE BAIL BONDS, INC., Respondent.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Shannon G. Elkins, entered on August 27, 2025. ECF No. 4. The R&R concludes that Petitioner William Earl Salgat’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1) should be denied and that this matter should be dismissed without issuance of a certificate of appealability. ECF No. 4 at 4. Neither Salgat nor Respondent A-Affordable Bail Bonds, Inc. objects to the R&R, so the Court reviews it for clear error. Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam); see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no error and adopts it in full.
ORDER Based on the foregoing, and on all the files, records, and proceedings, in this matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The R&R (ECF No. 4) is ADOPTED; 2. Salgat’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is DENIED; 3. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 4. No certificate of appealability will be issued.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: September 29, 2025 s/Laura M. Provinzino Laura M. Provinzino United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
WILLIAM EARL SALGAT, Case No. 25-cv-3353 (LMP/SGE) Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION A-AFFORDABLE BAIL BONDS, INC., Respondent.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Shannon G. Elkins, entered on August 27, 2025. ECF No. 4. The R&R concludes that Petitioner William Earl Salgat’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1) should be denied and that this matter should be dismissed without issuance of a certificate of appealability. ECF No. 4 at 4. Neither Salgat nor Respondent A-Affordable Bail Bonds, Inc. objects to the R&R, so the Court reviews it for clear error. Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam); see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no error and adopts it in full.
ORDER Based on the foregoing, and on all the files, records, and proceedings, in this matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The R&R (ECF No. 4) is ADOPTED; 2. Salgat’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is DENIED; 3. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 4. No certificate of appealability will be issued.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: September 29, 2025 s/Laura M. Provinzino Laura M. Provinzino United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.