U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2025

Spottswood v. Washington County MN Probation

Spottswood v. Washington County MN Probation
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided October 10, 2025
Spottswood v. Washington County MN Probation

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Shawn Clarke Spottswood, File No. 25-cv-2933 (ECT/ECW) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Washington County MN Probation, Dakota County MN, Ann Herbst, and Commissioner of Corrections, Respondents.

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright issued a Report and Recommendation on September 11, 2025. ECF No. 4. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based on all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 4] is ACCEPTED.

2. Petitioner Shawn Clarke Spottswood’s Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF No. 1] is DENIED for failure to exhaust state-court remedies.

3. Petitioner Spottswood’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs [ECF No. 2] is DENIED AS MOOT.

4. No certificate of appealability will issue.

Dated: October 10, 2025 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Shawn Clarke Spottswood, File No. 25-cv-2933 (ECT/ECW) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Washington County MN Probation, Dakota County MN, Ann Herbst, and Commissioner of Corrections, Respondents.

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright issued a Report and Recommendation on September 11, 2025. ECF No. 4. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based on all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 4] is ACCEPTED.

2. Petitioner Shawn Clarke Spottswood’s Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF No. 1] is DENIED for failure to exhaust state-court remedies.

3. Petitioner Spottswood’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs [ECF No. 2] is DENIED AS MOOT.

4. No certificate of appealability will issue.

Dated: October 10, 2025 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.