U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2025

Mindy L. Chapman v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons

Mindy L. Chapman v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided October 24, 2025
Mindy L. Chapman v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Mindy L. Chapman, File No. 25-cv-3358 (ECT/DLM) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, Respondent.

Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko issued a Report and Recommendation on September 26, 2025. ECF No. 5. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based on all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 5] is ACCEPTED; 2. Petitioner Mindy L. Chapman’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus [ECF No. 1] is DENIED; and 3. The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: October 24, 2025 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Mindy L. Chapman, File No. 25-cv-3358 (ECT/DLM) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, Respondent.

Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko issued a Report and Recommendation on September 26, 2025. ECF No. 5. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based on all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 5] is ACCEPTED; 2. Petitioner Mindy L. Chapman’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus [ECF No. 1] is DENIED; and 3. The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: October 24, 2025 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.