U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2025

DeAngelo Cross v. Warden, FCI Duluth

DeAngelo Cross v. Warden, FCI Duluth
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided October 29, 2025
DeAngelo Cross v. Warden, FCI Duluth

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

DeAngelo Cross, Civ. No. 25-2170 (JWB/JFD) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT & Warden, FCI Duluth, RECOMMENDATION Respondent.

DeAngelo Cross, pro se Petitioner.

Ana H. Voss, Esq., and Lucas B. Draisey, Esq., United States Attorney’s Office, counsel for Respondent.

United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on October 7, 2025. (Doc. No. 16.) No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time permitted. Absent timely objections, the R&R is reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the R&R, no clear error is found.

ORDER Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records, and proceedings in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The October 7, 2025 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 16) is ACCEPTED; 2. Petitioner DeAngelo Cross’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED; and 3. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Date: October 29, 2025 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell JERRY W. BLACKWELL United States District Judge

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

DeAngelo Cross, Civ. No. 25-2170 (JWB/JFD) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT & Warden, FCI Duluth, RECOMMENDATION Respondent.

DeAngelo Cross, pro se Petitioner.

Ana H. Voss, Esq., and Lucas B. Draisey, Esq., United States Attorney’s Office, counsel for Respondent.

United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on October 7, 2025. (Doc. No. 16.) No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time permitted. Absent timely objections, the R&R is reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the R&R, no clear error is found.

ORDER Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records, and proceedings in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The October 7, 2025 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 16) is ACCEPTED; 2. Petitioner DeAngelo Cross’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED; and 3. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Date: October 29, 2025 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell JERRY W. BLACKWELL United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.