Kenyatta Michel v. Jared Rardin, FMC Rochester Warden
Kenyatta Michel v. Jared Rardin, FMC Rochester Warden
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA KENYATTA MICHEL, Case No. 25-CV-3547 (NEB/ECW) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JARED RARDIN, FMC Rochester Warden, Respondent.
The Court has received the October 1, 2025 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. (ECF No. 5.) No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 5) is ACCEPTED; 2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is DENIED; 3. The action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and 4. Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 3) is DENIED AS MOOT.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: November 10, 2025 BY THE COURT: s/Nancy E. Brasel Nancy E. Brasel United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA KENYATTA MICHEL, Case No. 25-CV-3547 (NEB/ECW) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JARED RARDIN, FMC Rochester Warden, Respondent.
The Court has received the October 1, 2025 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. (ECF No. 5.) No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 5) is ACCEPTED; 2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is DENIED; 3. The action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and 4. Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 3) is DENIED AS MOOT.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: November 10, 2025 BY THE COURT: s/Nancy E. Brasel Nancy E. Brasel United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.