Mohamed A. Ali v. State of Minnesota and Minnesota IT Services
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Mohamed A. Ali, File No. 25-CV-3740 (JMB/JFD) Plaintiff, v. ORDER State of Minnesota and Minnesota IT Services, Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate John F. Docherty dated October 24, 2025. (Doc. No. 5.) The R&R recommends that the Court dismiss this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Id.) Neither party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed.
See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED.
2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: November 21, 2025 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Mohamed A. Ali, File No. 25-CV-3740 (JMB/JFD) Plaintiff, v. ORDER State of Minnesota and Minnesota IT Services, Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate John F. Docherty dated October 24, 2025. (Doc. No. 5.) The R&R recommends that the Court dismiss this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Id.) Neither party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed.
See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED.
2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: November 21, 2025 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.