Hmong College Prep Academy v. Woodstock Capital, LLC and Clark Reiner
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Hmong College Prep Academy, Civ. No. 21-1721 (PAM/DLM) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Woodstock Capital, LLC and Clark Reiner, Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko dated November 6, 2025. (Docket No. 96.) The R&R recommends granting Plaintiff Hmong College Prep Academy’s unopposed Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement. (Docket No. 90.)
This Court must review de novo any portion of an R&R to which specific objections are made, but in the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R only for clear error. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b); see also Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (noting that district court need only review un-objected-to R&R for clear error). The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds no error, clear or otherwise, in the Magistrate Judge’s reasoning.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The R&R (Docket No. 96) is ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff Hmong College Prep Academy’s unopposed Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (Docket No. 90) is GRANTED; 3. Defendants Woodstock Capital, LLC and Clark Reiner shall specifically perform their payment obligation under Section 1 of the Settlement Agreement by delivering to Hmong College Prep Academy the Settlement Payment required by Section 1 of the Settlement Agreement by no later than five business days following the issuance of this Order; and 4. Judgment is entered for Plaintiff Hmong College Prep Academy in the amount of the Settlement Payment required by Section 1 of the Settlement Agreement.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: December 3, 2025 s/ Paul A. Magnuson Paul A. Magnuson United States District Court Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Hmong College Prep Academy, Civ. No. 21-1721 (PAM/DLM) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Woodstock Capital, LLC and Clark Reiner, Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko dated November 6, 2025. (Docket No. 96.) The R&R recommends granting Plaintiff Hmong College Prep Academy’s unopposed Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement. (Docket No. 90.)
This Court must review de novo any portion of an R&R to which specific objections are made, but in the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R only for clear error. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b); see also Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (noting that district court need only review un-objected-to R&R for clear error). The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds no error, clear or otherwise, in the Magistrate Judge’s reasoning.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The R&R (Docket No. 96) is ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff Hmong College Prep Academy’s unopposed Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (Docket No. 90) is GRANTED; 3. Defendants Woodstock Capital, LLC and Clark Reiner shall specifically perform their payment obligation under Section 1 of the Settlement Agreement by delivering to Hmong College Prep Academy the Settlement Payment required by Section 1 of the Settlement Agreement by no later than five business days following the issuance of this Order; and 4. Judgment is entered for Plaintiff Hmong College Prep Academy in the amount of the Settlement Payment required by Section 1 of the Settlement Agreement.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: December 3, 2025 s/ Paul A. Magnuson Paul A. Magnuson United States District Court Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.