Steven E. Seets v. Warden, FCI Sandstone
Steven E. Seets v. Warden, FCI Sandstone
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Steven E. Seets, Civ. No. 25-3456 (JWB/DJF) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Warden, FCI Sandstone, OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE Respondent.
United States Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on September 19, 2025, recommending that Petitioner Steven E. Seets’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. (Doc. No. 9.) On October 20, 2025, Petitioner’s deadline to object to that R&R was extended to November 10, 2025. (Doc. No. 12.)
Four weeks have passed since the extended deadline expired, and no objections have been filed to the R&R. Absent timely objections, an R&R is reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996).
Having reviewed the R&R, no clear error is found.
ORDER Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all the files, records, and proceedings in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The September 19, 2025 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 9) is ACCEPTED.
2. Petitioner Steven E. Seets’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED.
3. Petitioner’s Motion to Expedite (Doc. No. 4) is DENIED as moot.
4. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Date: December 8, 2025 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell JERRY W. BLACKWELL United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Steven E. Seets, Civ. No. 25-3456 (JWB/DJF) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Warden, FCI Sandstone, OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE Respondent.
United States Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on September 19, 2025, recommending that Petitioner Steven E. Seets’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. (Doc. No. 9.) On October 20, 2025, Petitioner’s deadline to object to that R&R was extended to November 10, 2025. (Doc. No. 12.)
Four weeks have passed since the extended deadline expired, and no objections have been filed to the R&R. Absent timely objections, an R&R is reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996).
Having reviewed the R&R, no clear error is found.
ORDER Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all the files, records, and proceedings in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The September 19, 2025 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 9) is ACCEPTED.
2. Petitioner Steven E. Seets’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED.
3. Petitioner’s Motion to Expedite (Doc. No. 4) is DENIED as moot.
4. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Date: December 8, 2025 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell JERRY W. BLACKWELL United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.