Hiram Ducasse, Jr. v. Mark King
Hiram Ducasse, Jr. v. Mark King
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Hiram Ducasse, Jr., File No. 24-cv-627 (ECT/JFD) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Mark King, Defendant.
Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty issued a Report and Recommendation on December 2, 2025. ECF No. 38. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based on all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 38] is ACCEPTED; and 2. Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: December 30, 2025 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Hiram Ducasse, Jr., File No. 24-cv-627 (ECT/JFD) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Mark King, Defendant.
Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty issued a Report and Recommendation on December 2, 2025. ECF No. 38. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based on all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 38] is ACCEPTED; and 2. Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: December 30, 2025 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.