UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Otis Mays, No. 25-cv-3113 (KMM/DTS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Bernard Holmes, et al., Defendants.

In a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) dated September 3, 2025, United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz recommends that this matter be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff Otis Mays did not object to this recommended disposition, so the Court has reviewed the matter for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F. Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). The Court finds no error and adopts the R&R. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The R&R (Dkt. 4) is ACCEPTED.

2. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute.

Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.

Date: December 30, 2025 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Otis Mays, No. 25-cv-3113 (KMM/DTS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Bernard Holmes, et al., Defendants.

In a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) dated September 3, 2025, United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz recommends that this matter be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff Otis Mays did not object to this recommended disposition, so the Court has reviewed the matter for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F. Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). The Court finds no error and adopts the R&R. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The R&R (Dkt. 4) is ACCEPTED.

2. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute.

Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.

Date: December 30, 2025 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge