Latrice Atik Dillard v. Paul Schnell, Commissioner of Corrections (Minnesota...
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Latrice Atik Dillard, Case No. 26-cv-0057 (KMM/DLM) Plaintiff, v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Paul Schnell, Commissioner of Corrections (Minnesota Department of Corrections) and Nannette Larson, Dept.
Commissioner, Defendants.
In an order dated January 8, 2026, this Court directed plaintiff Latrice Atik Dillard to pay an initial partial filing fee of $18.20, consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). See Doc.
4. Ms. Dillard was given 21 days to pay the mandatory initial partial filing fee, failing which it would be recommended that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See id. (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)).
That deadline has now passed, and Ms. Dillard has not paid the required initial partial filing fee for this matter. In fact, Ms. Dillard has not communicated with the Court about this case at all since commencing this action. Accordingly, this Court now recommends, consistent with the warning previously given to Ms. Dillard, that this action be dismissed without prejudice under Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute. See Wewerka v. Roper, 431 F. App’x 517, 517 (8th Cir. 2011) (per curiam) (affirming dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) following prisoner’s failure to pay initial partial filing fee).
RECOMMENDATION Based upon the foregoing, and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute.
Dated: February 6, 2026 _s/Douglas L. Micko____________ DOUGLAS L. MICKO United States Magistrate Judge
NOTICE Filing Objections: This Report and Recommendation is not an order or judgment of the District Court and is therefore not appealable directly to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Under Local Rule 72.2(b)(1), “a party may file and serve specific written objections to a magistrate judge’s proposed finding and recommendations within 14 days after being served a copy” of the Report and Recommendation. A party may respond to those objections within 14 days after being served a copy of the objections. See Local Rule 72.2(b)(2). All objections and responses must comply with the word or line limits set forth in Local Rule 72.2(c).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.