U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2026

Jane Doe v. City of West Richland, The; Brent Gerry; Selena Smathers; Steven...

Jane Doe v. City of West Richland, The; Brent Gerry; Selena Smathers; Steven...
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided April 1, 2026
Jane Doe v. City of West Richland, The; Brent Gerry; Selena Smathers; Steven...

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Jane Doe, Case No. 26-CV-00803 (JMB/DTS) Plaintiff,

ORDER v. City of West Richland, The; Brent Gerry; Selena Smathers; Steven Crown; Stacy Ryan; and Brooke Connor Ehr, Defendants.

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate David T. Schultz. (Doc. No. 3.) The R&R recommends that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (See id.) Neither party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed.

See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).

In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).

Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. No. 3) is ADOPTED.

2. The Court dismisses this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: April 1, 2026 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.