Babcock v. Banning
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1974, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Ebenezer Society v. Minnesota State Board of Health (Minn. 1974)
- State Ex Rel. Bowen v. Dist. Court of Blue Earth (Minn. 1930)
- Crosby v. Farmer (Minn. 1888)
- Goener v. Woll (Minn. 1879)
- Knox v. Randall (Minn. 1878)
- Sandford v. Sandford (Ky. Ct. App. 1872)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
By the Court
This Court will not entertain a case and review a judgment rendered in the District Court, where it appears satisfactorily that the subject* matter of the action has been settled by the parties, and the judgment satisfied. It is quite clear from the affidavits read on this motion, that Babcock knew of and assented to the adjustment of
Tbe motion to dismiss tbe writ is granted.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.