Daniels v. Ward
Daniels v. Ward
Opinion of the Court
By the Court. The action below was upon a promissory note for five hundred dollars, payable thirty days from date, with interest after maturity at the rate of five per cent, per month. The Defendant, Daniels, appeared and objected to the recovery of more than seven per cent, per annum, as damages after the maturity and breach of .the contract. The court overruled the objection and ordered judgment upon the note for the face and the stipulated damages at five per cent, per month after the breach, and judgment was entered accordingly. The Defendant saved his exceptions, and brings a writ of error to review this ruling of the court.
The damages cannot be stipulated at any certain amount in
The Defendant being entitled to a reduction on the judgment, we remand the case with instructions to the District Court of Pamsey County to modify the judgment by striking out of the same all the damages included therein beyond seven per cent, per annum upon the principal sum after the maturity of the note.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Joseph Daniels, in Error v. Howard Ward, in Error
- Status
- Published