Stevens v. Currey
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1886, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Knight v. Valentine (Minn. 1886)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
By the Court —
— The only question to be determined in this case is whether after a cause is regularly noticed for trial and placed upon the calendar, an amendment of the pleadings requires a new notice of trial before the case can be disposed of if either party objects.
It is expressly provided by statute when the proper notice of trial and note^ of issue are given, that the clerk shall enter the cause upon the calendar according to the date of the issue, and “The issues once placed upon the calendar of a term if not tried at the term for which the notice was given, need not be noticed
Amendments of pleadings both before and upon the trial of causes are of common occurrence. If the position of the appellant is correct, no cause could be tried where an amendment of the pleadings takes place until a subsequent term, and until new notice of trial is given. An amendment of pleadings is not a final disposition, although it may be a change of the - issues in an action, and does not under our statute require a new notice of trial. We see no error in the proceedings of the Court below.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.