Ingersoll v. First National Bank
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Home Land & Loan Co. v. Routh (Ark. 1916)
- In re M. E. Dunn & Co. (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas 1912)
- Rock Island Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Fourth National Bank (Kan. 1901)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
By the Court —
— Proceedings against a garnishee are for the purpose of reaching the property of the defendant.
The deposit of money in the bank in the name of “ Samuel S. Eaton, Agent,” is not conclusive evidence that the money was the property of said Eaton, or that the bank thereby became his debtor. If the money is not the property of the defendant, the plaintiff is not legally or equitably entitled to it.' The garnishee having denied any indebtedness to the defendant, or the possession or control of any property, money, or effects belonging to him, the plaintiff can only proceed further by filing a supplemental complaint as provided in Chap. 70, of Laws of 1860,
The order appealed from is affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.