Turner v. Holleran
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1876, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Chicago, R.I. & P.R. Co. v. Stude Stude v. Chicago, R.I. & P.R. Co. Stude v. Chicago, R.I. & P.R. Co (8th Cir. 1953)
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Kay (District Court, S.D. Iowa 1952)
- City of Eufaula v. Ahrens (Okla. 1916)
- Myers v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. (Iowa 1902)
- Boom Co. v. Patterson (Supreme Court of the United States 1879)
- Rippe v. Chicago, Dubuque & Minnesota Railroad (Minn. 1876)
- Rippe v. Chicago, Dubuque & Minnesota Railroad (Minn. 1873)
- Warren v. First Division of the St. Paul & Pacific Railroad (Minn. 1872)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
By the Gowrt
The appeal in this case, from the assessment made by the commissioners, only brought before the District Court, the question as to the propriety of
But aside from this objection, the appeal must be dismissed, for the reason that the order appealed from is not appealable. It can only be claimed that an appeal from this order is authorized by the 6th Sub. of Sec. 11, Chap. Yl, Comp. Stats., which provides that an appeal may be taken from a final order affecting a substantial right made in a special proceeding. No legal question involved in the proceeding was definitely settled, nor was any substantial right of any of the parties affected by the order appealed from. The proceeding still remained pending in the court, and the right to review all the questions involved was unimpaired by the decision of said motion. The final order mentioned in this section refers to final orders in the nature of judgments, and if it is admitted that an appeal lies in such cases, it only lies alter the entry of judgment, where both the judgment and intermediate order are open for review.
Appeal dismissed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.