Minnesota Supreme Court, 1870

Minnesota Valley R. R. v. Doran

Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided January 15, 1870 · McMillan

15 Minn. 240 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

Swan efe Bangs for Appellant., Caldwell & Severance and Brisbin & Palmer for Respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1878, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Cochrane v. Halsey (Minn. 1878)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

-McMillan, J.

By the Court.This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside a judgment, and all subsequent proceedings.

The cause has already been before us on an appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial. Both appeals having been submitted together, we have arrived at the conclusion that the order denying a new trial must be reversed. *241"and a new trial granted, for error occuring on the trial in the court below. It follows from the conclusion in that case that the judgment, and all subsequent proceedings should be set aside, and vacated. It is unnecessary for us, therefore, to consider the questions raised upon the appeal in this ease.

Order reversed, and judgment, and all subsequent proceedings, vacated and set aside.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.