Carpenter v. Comfort

Item: Carpenter v. Comfort
Author: hallapproved.com

Minnesota Supreme Court April 14, 1876

Carpenter v. Comfort, 22 Minn. 539 (Minn. 1876)

1876 Minn. LEXIS 51

Gilfillan

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 7 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Opinion of the Court

Gilfillan, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to change the place of trial. Such an order does not involve the merits of the action, or any part thereof, under Gen. St. ch. 86, § 8. If reviewable at all, it must *540be upon an appeal from tbe judgment, (or perhaps from an ■order denying a new trial,) as an order affecting the judgment.

Appeal dismissed.1

The rule in this case was followed in Benton v. Flynn, decided April 26, 1876. Macdonald 4 Southworth, for appellants; Benton 4 Benton, for respondent.

Reference

Full Case Name: Justus Carpenter & another v. Oscar H. Comfort & another
Cited By: 9 cases
Status: Published