Minnesota Supreme Court, 1876

Carpenter v. Comfort

Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided April 14, 1876 · Gilfillan

22 Minn. 539; 1876 Minn. LEXIS 51 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

Fayette Marsh, for appellants., L. W. Collins and Chas. P>. Kerr, for respondents.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1921, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

Winegar v. Martin (Minn. 1921)
Antonsky v. City Dye House (Minn. 1909)
Taylor v. Grand Lodge A. O. U. W. (Minn. 1906)
State ex rel. Jones v. District Court (Minn. 1904)
State ex rel. Minneapolis Threshing-Machine Co. v. District Court (Minn. 1899)
Allis v. White (Minn. 1894)
Hinds v. Backus (Minn. 1891)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Gilfillan, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to change the place of trial. Such an order does not involve the merits of the action, or any part thereof, under Gen. St. ch. 86, § 8. If reviewable at all, it must *540be upon an appeal from tbe judgment, (or perhaps from an ■order denying a new trial,) as an order affecting the judgment.

Appeal dismissed.1

The rule in this case was followed in Benton v. Flynn, decided April 26, 1876. Macdonald 4 Southworth, for appellants; Benton 4 Benton, for respondent.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.