Reed v. Pixley
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1880, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Reid v. Topper (Ariz. 1927)
- Miles v. Wann (Minn. 1880)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is an action upon an account stated between plaintiffs jointly, on the one hand, and defendants jointly on the other. The separate answers of the defendants put in issue the stating of the account. Under this issue it was competent for either defendant to show that the account was not stated by him or her; but if the plaintiffs proved the stating of the account by one of the defendants, they were entitled to recover against that one alone under Laws 1873, ch. 67'. It follows that the court below erred in instructing the jury, in effect, that, as defendants were
Order reversed.
Cornell, J., having been of counsel, did not sit in this case.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.