Thompson v. Sutton
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1957, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Jensen v. Murray (Minn. 1957)
- Barnes v. Verry (Minn. 1923)
- Henry v. Traynor (Minn. 1889)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
If, for the purposes of this case, it be admitted that, under the provisions of Gen. St. c. 66, § 269, a judgment can be levied upon by execution, still, as it is a thing in action, (Fore v. Manlove, 18 Cal. 437; Burtis v. Cook, 16 Iowa, 194,) the sale can be made only “if the court so orders.” Gen. St. c. 66, § 284.
Order affirmed.
Gilfillan, C. J., having been of counsel, did not sit in this case.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.