Minnesota Supreme Court, 1876

Partridge v. Blanchard

Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided June 26, 1876 · Gtileillan

23 Minn. 69; 1876 Minn. LEXIS 89 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

J. Q. <& J. D. Farmer, for appellants., Dryden Smith, for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

GtILEillan, C. J.

The complaint sets out a contract *71for the sale and delivery of the sheep, and a breach of the contract. In such a case the general allegation of damage is sufficient to admit proof of, and a recovery for, general damages, and it is not ground of demurrer that the allegation of special damage is insufficient.

Judgment reversed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.