State v. Miller

Minnesota Supreme Court
State v. Miller, 23 Minn. 352 (Minn. 1877)
1877 Minn. LEXIS 25
Cornell

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 5 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

State v. Miller

Opinion of the Court

Cornell, J.

The question sought to be presented and argued by defendant is not properly before us for consideration. The return to the appeal contains no exceptions taken to “any opinion, direction, or judgment” of the court below, and settled, allowed, and made a part of the judgment roll, as prescribed by Gen. St. c. 117, § 6. Hence, the only question which can be considered upon the record before us is as to the sufficiency of the indictment to support the judgment. As appellant- makes no question of this character, and none is apparent to the court, the judgment is affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
State of Minnesota v. Leo Miller, impleaded, etc.
Cited By
5 cases
Status
Published