State ex rel. Dauwalter v. Goetz
State ex rel. Dauwalter v. Goetz
Opinion of the Court
The only question in this case arises under the very peculiar act of the legislature of February 17, 1877, entitled “An act to incorporate the village of Carver, in the county of Carver.” Sp. Laws, c. 7. That act sets apart and incorporates the entire township of Carver as the village of Carver, and declares that it shall be incorporated and organized under the provision of chapter 139, Gen. Laws 1875, and purports to invest it with certain “special rights,” among which is this provision: “The officers of said village shall.be ex officio town officers, and shall have the same powers as township officers now have, to-wit: three trustees, (one of whom shall be chairman,) treasurer, recorder, and assessor; shall have the same powers respectively as the supervisors, treasurer, town clerk, and assessor.” § 3, sub. 3. As it is not to be supposed that the legislature intended by this provision to defeat or impair the general purpose of the act, to-wit, the incorporation of the town as a village, under the act of 1875, with the officers, and powers, and duties provided in that act, and as the act of 1877 does not define any powers •or duties for these ex officio township officers, we cannot see what their duties and powers, as such, can be, unless there may be duties and powers pertaining to township officers not
The alternative writ of mandamus is discharged.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- The State of Minnesota ex rel. Chas. D. Dauwalter and others v. Christ. A. Goetz
- Status
- Published