Weber v. Clark
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1935, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Simmer v. Simmer, Jr. (Minn. 1935)
- Vere v. Rosafa (District Court, D. Puerto Rico 1919)
- Farmer v. Holmes (N.D. 1916)
- Crawford v. Surety Investment Co. (Kan. 1914)
- Bentley v. Edwards (Minn. 1914)
- McGrath v. Cannon (Minn. 1893)
- Nelichka v. Esterly (Minn. 1882)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Defendant owned a farm of two hundred acres, and agreed to pay Weber one hundred dollars if he
Clearly he was not entitled to recover anything. The contract was entire that Weber should find a purchaser for the whole farm, and that for doing so defendant should pay bim one hundred dollars. Weber was not entitled to anything until he performed his part of the contract, and found a purchaser willing to buy the whole farm. This he did not do.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.