Ryan v. Kranz

Minnesota Supreme Court
Ryan v. Kranz, 25 Minn. 362 (Minn. 1879)
1879 Minn. LEXIS 7
Berry

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 4 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Ryan v. Kranz

Opinion of the Court

Berry, J.

This case was tried by the district court without a jury. As conclusions of law, the court finds “that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover, and that the defendant is entitled to judgment against the plaintiff for his costs and disbursements, ” adding the words: “Let judgment be entered accordingly.” This direction is a part of the “decision” of the court, within the evident meaning of Gen. St. c. 66, § 226.. It is not an order involving the merits, or any part thereof,, within the meaning of Gen. St. c. 86, § 8, subd. 3, relating-to appeals in civil actions. It is merely a direction that an act be done which does involve the merits, to wit, that judgment be entered. It is, therefore, not appealable. Von Glahn v. Sommer, 11 Minn. 132 (203;) Lamb v. McCanna, 14 Minn. 513; Searles v. Thompson, 18 Minn. 320.

Appeal dismissed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Timothy Ryan v. N. F. H. Kranz and others
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published