Croft v. Miller
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1935, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Alfred v. Anderson (N.M. 1974)
- Fulton v. Okes (Minn. 1935)
- Nikannis Co. v. City of Duluth (Minn. 1909)
- Krafve v. Roy (Minn. 1906)
- Cummings v. Edwards-Wood Co. (Minn. 1905)
- Duxbury v. Shanahan (Minn. 1901)
- St. Anthony Falls Bank v. Graham (Minn. 1897)
- United States Savings, Loan & Building Co. v. Ahrens (Minn. 1892)
- McConnell v. Rakness (Minn. 1889)
- McClearn v. Arnold (Minn. 1927)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is, in effect, an appeal from an order of the district court for Nobles county, for judgment against a- garnishee. Gen. St. 1878, e. 66, § 197, enacts that any party to a garnishment proceeding, deeming himself aggrieved by any order or final judgment therein, may remove the same from a district court-to the supreme court, by appeal, in the same cases, in like manner, and with like effect as in a civil action.
That no appeal lies from an order for judgment in a civil action has been settled by several decisions of this court. Lamb v. McCanna, 14 Minn. 513; Rogers v. Holyoke, 14 Minn. 514; Searles v. Thompson, 18 Minn. 316; Ryan v.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.