Abrahams v. Sheehan
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1944, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Merchants & Farmers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. (Minn. 1944)
- State Ex Rel. Yapp v. Chase (Minn. 1925)
- Sweet v. Myers (S.D. 1892)
- Koethe v. O'Brien (Minn. 1884)
- Sherman v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. (Minn. 1883)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In this case the “statement of the case,” though stipulated by the attorneys for the respective parties, was not allowed and signed by the judge. The objection ia made here by the respondents that no exceptions appearing only on the statement can be considered here, because it is not. signed by the judge. The point is well taken. The statute expressly provides for allowance and signature by the judge, (Gen. St. 1878, c. 66, § 255,) and we do not think it can be dispensed with. Leonard v. Warriner, 20 Wis. 41.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.