La Grange Mill Co. v. Bennewitz
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1887, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- City of Plankinton v. Gray (8th Cir. 1894)
- Perkins v. Merrill (Minn. 1887)
- Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Brackett (Minn. 1887)
- Monson v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. (Minn. 1885)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
After alleging that the plaintiff is a corporation, duly •created and organized under the laws of this state, etc., the complaint in this action proceeds further to allege that “plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement to and with each other,” for the purchase and storage of wheat by defendant for plaintiff, for a commission to be paid by the latter. The fact of plaintiff’s capacity and power to make such an agreement is included and implied in the allegation that it “entered into” the same. In the absence of the power and capacity this allegation could not be true. State of Wisconsin v. Torinus, 22 Minn. 272. This view is equally applicable to the count for .goods sold and delivered.
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.