State ex rel. Schmitt v. Macdonald
Minnesota Supreme Court
State ex rel. Schmitt v. Macdonald, 29 Minn. 440 (Minn. 1882)
13 N.W. 671; 1882 Minn. LEXIS 145
State ex rel. Schmitt v. Macdonald
Opinion of the Court
The alternative writ must be quashed on two grounds: First, the affidavit does not set forth a copy of the proposed statement ■of the case, nor show what it was, so that this court can see that it was necessary, in order to present the case .properly to this court, that the
Reference
- Full Case Name
- State of Minnesota, ex rel. George Schmitt v. J. L. Macdonald
- Status
- Published