Kohn v. Fandel
Minnesota Supreme Court
Kohn v. Fandel, 29 Minn. 470 (Minn. 1882)
13 N.W. 904; 1882 Minn. LEXIS 151
Can I rely on this case?
Yes — no negative treatment found
Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.
Kohn v. Fandel
Opinion of the Court
The evidence of the defendant clearly and unmistakably shows that the services sued for were rendered under a contract to work for three months, and that, before the end of such term, plaintiff quit work without any excuse. This evidence is not contradicted by plaintiff, and there is no reason suggested by the record for disregarding it. Upon it the judgment ought to have been for defendant.
Order reversed, and new trial ordered.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Bernard Kohn v. Henry Fandel
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published