Kohn v. Fandel
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1908, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Johnson v. Fehsefeldt (Minn. 1908)
- Peterson v. Mayer (Minn. 1891)
- Sipley v. Stickney (Mass. 1906)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The evidence of the defendant clearly and unmistakably shows that the services sued for were rendered under a contract to work for three months, and that, before the end of such term, plaintiff quit work without any excuse. This evidence is not contradicted by plaintiff, and there is no reason suggested by the record for disregarding it. Upon it the judgment ought to have been for defendant.
Order reversed, and new trial ordered.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.