Minnesota Supreme Court, 1883

Nelson v. Munch

Nelson v. Munch
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided January 9, 1883
30 Minn. 132; 14 N.W. 578; 1883 Minn. LEXIS 104 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

E. C. Palmer, for plaintiffs., H. J. Horn, for defendants.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1920, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Nelson v. Munch

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

By the Court,.

Where several plaintiffs or defendants bring an appeal from a judgment, and it is modified as to some of the appellants and affirmed as to the others, the respondent is entitled to costs and disbursements against those as to whom it is affirmed, and those as to whom it is modified are entitled to costs and disbursements against the respondent. The clerk’s taxation is set aside and costs will be taxed in accordance herewith.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.