Rugland v. Anderson

Minnesota Supreme Court
Rugland v. Anderson, 30 Minn. 386 (Minn. 1883)
15 N.W. 676; 1883 Minn. LEXIS 164

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 20 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Rugland v. Anderson

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The right to maintain an action of this kind being created by Gen. St. 1878, c. 77, § 2, is such as that section gives and no other. Nash v. Tousley, 28 Minn. 5. It is, therefore, subject to the limitation which that section prescribes, viz.: that it must “be commenced within two years after the act or omission by which the death was caused.” To this limitation the statute makes no exception, and none can be made by construction.

jLet judgment be entered in the district court for defendants.

Reference

Full Case Name
Stephen C. Rugland, Administrator v. Tollif Anderson and another
Cited By
20 cases
Status
Published